How Japan Pulled Off the Last Great Economic Miracle

How Japan Pulled Off the Last Great Economic Miracle

At the height of Japan’s late 1980s economic 
bubble, reality seemed to warp. In Tokyo, a mere parking lot was worth more than all of New 
York’s Central Park. The tiny 3.4 square kilometer Imperial Palace grounds were valued higher than 
the entire real estate market of California. Japanese corporations were on a global shopping 
spree. Mitsubishi’s real estate arm bought a controlling stake in New York’s Rockefeller Center 
for $846 million in 1989. And that same year, Sony acquired Hollywood’s Colombia Pictures for 
$3.4 billion. It was as if Japan Inc. could buy the world. And for a moment, many feared or hoped 
it might. This era defied economic gravity. The Nikki stock index surged sixfold in one decade, 
starting around 6,000 in 1980 and cresting near 39,000 by the end of 1989. every year brought new 
market highs, minting paper millionaires by the thousands. Tokyo’s glitzy Ginsa district jumped 
so much that one square meter sold for 32 million yen, approximately $230,000. Japan’s stock market 
alone made up 45% of global market capitalization at the peak, with the US a distant second at 33%. 
Trillions of dollars in speculative wealth were created virtually overnight. In 1987, gains from 
Japanese stocks and property amounted to roughly $3.4 trillion, equivalent to well over a full year 
of GDP. But this stunning ascent, what observers called the Japanese economic miracle, didn’t come 
out of nowhere. Japan’s path from postwar ruin to 1980s superpower was paved by a unique alignment 
of historical forces. How did Japan achieve this once in a century boom? And why have we never seen 
another country replicate a Japan-style miracle since? To understand that, we need to rewind to 
the end of World War II and the forging of an unprecedented geopolitical bargain. In the 1980s, 
Japan’s economy seemed unstoppable. Even other wealthy nations looked on in awe and alarm. 
By 1988, Japan had become the second largest economy on the planet, a position it had held 
since overtaking West Germany in the late 1960s. Its GDP reached about $5 trillion at the peak, 
an astonishing 2.5 times the size of Germany’s and over four times that of China’s at the time. 
And Japan accomplished this with a population of only approximately 120 million. In per capita 
terms, Japan in the 1980s and early 1990s was the richest large country in the world, 
even outstripping the US on some measures. The island nation had risen from wartime ashes 
to a level of affluence and technological prowess that prompted bestsellers like Japan as number 
one. Observers wondered if it was just a matter of time before Japan overtook the US to become the 
largest economy overall. The economic statistics from this era boggle the mind. The Nikki 225 stock 
index soared by nearly 500% during the 1980s with exuberant gains of plus 40% in 1988 and plus 29% 
in 1989 alone. At one point the total market value of Japanese stocks was 45% of the world’s equity 
market. Nearly half of all global stock wealth was tied up in Japan. For comparison, the entire 
United States accounted for just 33% at that time. Japan’s banks and industrial giants dominated 
rankings of the world’s largest companies. In 1989, seven of the world’s 10 biggest firms 
by market cap were Japanese. Tokyo’s vibrant financial center was a wash with cash, credit, 
and confidence. Meanwhile, land and property in Japan became the priciest on Earth. By late 1980s, 
Tokyo’s prime real estate had no real comparison. A single downtown Tokyo car park was allegedly 
worth more than all of Manhattan’s Central Park, and the land beneath the Imperial Palace was 
valued greater than all of California. In 1987 alone, Tokyo land prices jumped 58%. The frenzy 
fed on itself. Rising stock prices drove corporate wealth higher which enabled more land purchases 
which in turn bolstered collateral for more loans and speculation. Japan’s corporate empires, the 
Ketsu conglomerates had easy access to credit and used it to bid up assets everywhere. Culturally, 
this boom transformed Japan. It upended the country’s famously straightlaced social norms with 
a mania for speculation and luxury. The cliche of diligent, frugal salarymen gave way briefly to an 
era of indulgence. Ordinary people bragged about getting rich off stocks. Young professionals 
queued around the block to watch electronic stock tickers and swap tips. Companies lavished 
perks on employees and urban legends abounded of extravagant spending. Corporate parties where 
geisha were flown in by helicopter or absurd gifts like a $1,000 pet cat to woo a sweetheart. 
We just thought it would never ever stop, recalled one financia of the time. A sense of technoutopian 
optimism pervaded the national psyche. Japan had mastered modernity, and the future belonged to 
it. Nowhere was this confidence more evident than in technology and industry. Japan utterly 
dominated sectors like consumer electronics, cameras, and automobiles. Sony, Panasonic, 
Toshiba, Canon. These brands became synonymous with quality and innovation. The Sony Walkman, 
for example, defined portable music worldwide. Toyota and Honda were conquering global auto 
markets famed for reliability. By the late 80s, Americans were buying nearly one out of 
every three cars from a Japanese maker, and US icons like Ford were on the defensive. 
In advanced industries, Japan also excelled. It produced the bulk of the world’s memory chips, 
lasers, and precision instruments. In 1988, Japanese firms held six of the top 10 positions 
in the semiconductor market. And by some measures, Japan’s share of high-tech manufacturing output 
even exceeded America’s. Internationally, this era sparked both admiration and alarm. To some, 
Japan’s success was a blueprint, the pinnacle of efficient manufacturing and long-term strategy. 
To others, it was a threat. Commentators in the West freted about being economically eclipsed. 
Popular books warned of a rising sun buying up American assets. US Congress held tense hearings 
on the trade imbalance. The perception was that Japan Inc. had a unified plan to outco compete 
the West using quality manufacturing and patient capital to systematically capture industries. 
Indeed, by 1989, a US bestseller was titled The Coming War with Japan, reflecting the anxiety 
of the time. Yet, we know in hindsight that this story did not simply continue upward to Japanese 
global dominance. In the early 1990s, Japan’s economic party came to an abrupt end. The stock 
market crashed and the property bubble burst, sending the nation into decades of stagnation, the 
infamous lost decades. But why? To answer that, we must look at how Japan got to the 1980s miracle 
in the first place. It turns out that Japan’s rise was propelled by some very special geopolitical 
tailwinds, conditions that no longer exist today. Japan’s postwar economic miracle didn’t happen 
in isolation. It was nurtured under a unique geopolitical umbrella provided by the United 
States during the Cold War. In the aftermath of World War II, as Japan lay devastated, a grand 
bargain was struck. Japan would focus on economic recovery while America guaranteed Japan’s 
security. This strategy, initiated by Prime Minister Shigaru Yoshida, became known as the 
Yoshida Doctrine. The US Japan Security Treaty of 1951, revised in 1960, cemented this arrangement. 
America stationed troops and warships to defend Japan. And in return, Japan could essentially 
outsource its defense and concentrate on growth. For Japan, this was an incredible free ride. 
Through the Cold War decades, Japan spent a mere 1% of its GDP or even less on its military, 
an informal cap in place. By the late 1970s, the US handled the heavy lifting, even maintaining 
bases in Okinawa and elsewhere at its own expense, about $2 billion per year by recent estimates. 
Japan’s small self-defense forces never had to project power abroad. This meant that billions 
of dollars that other countries would pour into armies and weapons, Japan instead poured 
into factories, technology, and education. In essence, Japan’s economic output got a 
boost because it wasn’t diverting resources into building a massive military. Uncle 
Sam was footing that bill. The American alliance did more than save Japan money. It also 
provided a stable international environment for trade. With the US as a steadfast ally, Japan 
had unfettered access to US markets and was welcomed into the Westernled trading system. 
During the 1950s and60s, as the Cold War raged, Washington saw a prosperous Japan as a bullwok 
against communism in Asia. Thus, the US tolerated Japan’s protective economic policies in a way 
it likely wouldn’t have for a non-ally. American officials often bit their tongues while Japan 
maintained high tariffs and closed certain markets to foreign competition in its early development 
years. This tacit indulgence allowed Japan to nurture its naent industries behind tariff walls 
until they were strong enough to compete globally. A classic infant industry strategy executed 
masterfully by Japan’s bureaucracy. Crucially, the US also directly fueled Japan’s recovery in 
the early years. The Korean War 1950 to 1953, for example, was a turning point. With war 
raging on the Korean Peninsula just across the sea from Japan, the US military turned Japan 
into its supply base. American procurement orders for everything from uniforms to trucks flooded 
Japanese factories. Companies like Toyota on the verge of bankruptcy after World War II suddenly 
got huge orders to build military vehicles and trucks for the US Army. This Korean war boom 
injected valuable foreign currency and demand into Japan’s economy at a critical moment, 
jumpstarting industrial growth. From there, Japan rode the wave of the US-led global economic 
expansion. In 1964, Japan joined the OECD, the club of advanced economies, and its exports, 
steel, ships, textiles, then electronics and cars, found eager buyers around the world. The Japanese 
government played its hand shrewdly in this environment. Throughout the 1950s and60s, Japan’s 
Ministry of International Trade and Industry, MITI, orchestrated a strategic industrial policy. 
It funneled cheap loans and subsidies to targeted sectors, steel, ship building, electronics, 
automobiles, and tightly controlled foreign exchange and imports. Bureaucrats steered 
private companies toward technologies and industries deemed crucial for growth. At the same 
time, Japan kept its currency undervalued under the Breton Woods system. The yen was fixed at an 
extremely cheap 360 yen per US dollar until 1971, which supercharged its export competitiveness. 
Effectively, the world was invited to buy Japanese goods, but Japan was cautious about buying from 
the world. This mercantalist approach worked wonders in the pro-f free trade anti-communist 
context of the cold war where the US and others mostly gave Japan a pass. By the late 1960s, 
Japan was often posting doubledigit GDP growth, the original East Asian miracle that later Asian 
tiger economies would emulate. An example of Japan’s guided capitalism, the formation of ketssu 
networks. These were alliances of manufacturers, banks, and trading companies that coordinated 
investment and production. During the high growth era, government policies encouraged the 
development of these corporate groups. Many evolved from pre-war Zibbatsu trusts. The Ketsu 
allowed Japan to marshall resources and maintain market stability internally. They also effectively 
blocked foreign companies from entering Japan’s domestic markets. Member companies held stock 
in each other, keeping out hostile takeovers, and they often sourced materials and components 
within their group. For instance, 83% of Japan development bank financing went to strategic 
industries like ship building, electric power, coal, and steel, often benefiting ketsu firms. 
Japan built a highly coordinated economy behind a shield of protectionism until its firms were 
efficient enough to overwhelm foreign competitors abroad. By the 1970s and 80s, this formula had 
turned Japan into an export juggernaut. But it also began to breed international friction. 
Japanese companies captured huge shares of markets from semiconductors to automobiles and 
Japan ran enormous trade surpluses, especially with the United States. American consumers were 
gobbling up Toyotas, Sony’s, and Panasonics, while Japan bought relatively fewer American goods. The 
outcome, a ballooning US Japan trade deficit that hit record levels in the 1980s. In 1985, the US 
trade deficit with Japan was estimated around $50 billion for that year alone, representing roughly 
onethird of America’s entire trade deficit. Politically, this became explosive. US lawmakers 
drafted dozens of protectionist bills targeting Japanese imports. Under pressure, Japan made 
some concessions, agreeing to voluntary export restraints on cars, opening certain markets, but 
the core imbalance persisted. The climax of this trade tension was the Plaza Accord of 1985. 
In a meeting at New York’s Plaza Hotel, the United States, Japan, and European allies struck 
a deal to depreciate the US dollar and let the yen rise to reduce trade imbalances. Japan agreed 
to this coordinated currency intervention and over the next two years the yen’s value roughly 
doubled against the dollar. The plaza accord did help shrink the US trade deficit a bit but it had 
unintended consequences for Japan. A stronger yen made Japan’s exports less unbeatable and squeezed 
manufacturers profits. In response, Japan’s central bank flooded the domestic economy with 
cheap credit to save off recession. Japanese firms finding it harder to export also started investing 
their money overseas often back into the US buying real estate and companies hence those high-profile 
purchases like Rockefeller Center and Colombia Pictures. Thus, ironically, American pressure in 
the 1980s forced Japan to revalue its currency and liberalize, which then contributed to the late8s 
bubble. The Bank of Japan’s low interest rates after 1985 made borrowing so easy that speculation 
in stocks and property went into overdrive and Japan’s trade surpluses while shrinking relative 
to GDP still pumped liquidity into the economy. As a contemporary noted, the Plaza Accord 
was intended to rectify trade imbalances, but instead it increased Japanese investment in 
the United States and generated new criticism of Japan’s economic prowess. By the end of the 
decade, Japan’s free ride was effectively over. The US and other trading partners were no longer 
willing to tolerate mercantile policies from an economic superpower. But Japan had already gotten 
enormously rich. The unique mix of circumstances, US military protection, tolerance for Japan’s 
trade strategy, and the timing of postwar global growth created a once-ina-lifetime runway for 
Japan to take off. By 1990, Japan had arrived at the pinnacle we saw. The geopolitical winds that 
lifted Japan were shifting. The Cold War ended. The US was becoming less inclined to give allies 
economic free passes, and global competition was heating up. Japan would soon find that dominating 
the hardwarebased 20th century economy was one thing, but the software-driven 21st century 
would be a different challenge altogether. The world economy that Japan conquered 
in the 20th century was one built on heavy industry and hardware. Cars, ships, steel, 
semiconductors, consumer electronics. These were Japan’s playing fields and it was unbeatable on 
them. However, as the 1990s and 2000s unfolded, the global economic center of gravity shifted 
towards software services and digitization. This shift played to the strengths of Silicon Valley 
and other more software ccentric ecosystems, not Japan’s. Simply put, the rules of the game 
changed and Japan struggled to adapt. Consider the tech landscape of the late 20th versus early 
21st century. In 1989, the titans were companies like Mitsubishi Bank, Sumitomo Bank, Toyota, 
NT, and IBM. Many of them Japanese industrial or finance giants. Fast forward to today and 
the largest companies are names like Apple, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, primarily software, 
internet, and platform companies. Not a single one is Japanese. In fact, the value of Japan’s 
entire stock market today, the Nikki index, is smaller than the combined market cap of 
just two US tech firms, Apple and Nvidia. That astonishing comparison underscores how 
completely the torch passed from Japan’s hardware era to the new software era. Japan went from 
owning nearly half of global stock value in 1989 to roughly 6% today. A dramatic relative decline 
as tech wealth migrated elsewhere. Why did this happen? One reason is that Japan’s corporate and 
innovation model was optimized for the integrated manufacturing age, not the open platform 
softwarecentric age. During its miracle years, Japan excelled at incremental improvement of 
hardware, refining manufacturing processes, achieving superlative quality control. Think of 
Toyota’s lean production or Sony’s craftsmanship. Its companies were vertically integrated and 
supply chains often kept in-house or within the Ketsu networks. This worked brilliantly for 
cars, consumer electronics, and appliances. But as computing and the internet matured, 
the industry shifted toward a more modular softwaredriven paradigm. In the PC industry, for 
example, the Winel Alliance, Windows plus Intel, created a standard platform that lots of companies 
could build on. The value moved into software, operating systems, applications, and standardized 
chips. Areas where Japan had less presence. US antitrust and market forces in the 1980s had 
broken up old American hardware monopolies and given rise to a more decentralized tech ecosystem. 
By the 1990s, innovation was coming from smaller risk-taking software startups and Silicon Valley 
venture garages, an arena quite foreign to Japan’s large hierarchical firms. Japan’s electronics 
giants missed many of these new trends. They were late to personal computing aside from 
some niche domestic PCs and they largely failed to dominate software or services. Japan did innovate 
in mobile phones early years before the iPhone. Japanese flip phones could do email, internet, 
and mobile payments. But these innovations stayed confined to Japan’s market. Often called the 
Galapagos syndrome, advanced but insular. When global standards like iOS/android smartphones 
emerged, Japanese phone makers like NEC, Panasonic, Sharp, and even Sony could not keep 
up internationally. Similarly, in video games, Japan led in console hardware, Nintendo, Sega, 
Sony PlayStation. But the broader software ecosystems, online gaming networks, mobile app 
stores later saw more competition from abroad. The impact on market share was stark in category 
after category. Japanese dominance eroded once the playing field globalized and shifted to 
software ccentric or modular competition. A striking example in 1987 Japanese firms controlled 
76% of the world DRAM memory chip market. By 2004 that share had plunged to just 3% as Korean and 
American firms took the lead. Japan’s once mighty TV industry, remember Sony Trinitrons, saw its 
global share evaporate with the rise of Korean and Chinese manufacturers. Japanese companies made 
95% of the world’s DVD players in 1997, but only 20% by 2006 as production shifted to lowerc cost 
countries. In the 2000s, Japanese brands nearly disappeared from the top ranks of mobile phone 
sales globally, eclipsed by the likes of Apple, Samsung, and later Chinese brands. Even in areas 
where Japan started out technologically ahead, it fell behind in capturing value. A government 
study highlighted that Japanese suppliers provided about 70% of the components in Apple’s iPod 
circa 2005. Things like the hard drive, display, etc., but only 20% of the components in an Apple 
iPad 2010. Why? Because the iPad had more of its value in the central processing chip and 
software designed by Apple in California and in other foreign sourced components. Japan 
remained excellent at precision manufacturing. It still makes worldclass camera sensors, car 
parts, batteries, and so on. But the highest value in tech shifted to intangible software, user 
experience, and ecosystems. Those were not Japan’s forte. Another factor was corporate culture and 
entrepreneurship. Japan’s miracle years were driven by large companies with lifetime employment 
norms and cautious management. Great for steady improvement, not so great for disruptive 
innovation. The 1990s and 2000s were an era of rapid change. The internet boom, do bust, then web 
2.0, requiring nimleness. The US saw an explosion of new firms, Amazon, Google, Facebook to name 
a few, that grew into giants. South Korea poured resources into a few chabled driven tech bets like 
Samsung’s pivot to smartphones. China embraced a quasi capitalist tech sector that produced 
Alibaba, Tencent, Huawei, etc. Japan, by contrast, saw relatively few successful startups or major 
corporate reinventions in the digital realm. Its best known tech companies by the 2010s were 
mostly the same names from the 1980s, many of them shadows of their former selves. Think Panasonic, 
which had to restructure drastically, or Sharp, which was bought by a Taiwanese company in 2016. 
Through the 1990s, Japan also dealt with the aftermath of the burst bubble, banks laden with 
bad debt, companies cutting costs, and consumers growing thrifty. It’s hard to overstate how much 
this long stagnation sapped Japan’s dynamism. The term lost decade turned into lost decades. From 
1991 to around 2003, Japan barely grew. Deflation, falling prices, became chronic. In nominal terms, 
Japan’s GDP in 2023 was actually smaller than it was in 1995, $4.2 trillion versus $5.5 trillion. 
An unheard of situation for a developed economy. While one might attribute some of this to 
deliberate deflationary policy and accounting, it’s still roughly the same size economy in 
real terms as 30 years ago. The stagnation meant less investment in new industries. The 
government tried stimulus after stimulus, and the central bank cut rates to zero, but Japan 
mostly treaded water economically. A society that had been supremely confident in 1989 became more 
conservative and risk averse, reluctant to chase bold new ventures that might finally break the 
funk. This collective risk aversion arguably caused Japan to underinvest in the very industries 
like global internet platforms or software that were booming elsewhere. By the 2010s, the 
verdict was clear. Japan would remain a wealthy, highly advanced nation, but it was no longer 
at the leading edge of growth and innovation globally. It still excelled in certain high-end 
manufacturing niches. From precision machinery to anime and video games, Japan continues to 
influence culture and tech, but it wasn’t going to drive the world economy as it once did. In 
short, Japan’s miracle was a product of a specific era, the hardware era. And once that era passed, 
Japan could not dominate the new game in the same

In the 1980s, Japan wasn’t just a rich country; it was a sci-fi civilization. It rose from nuclear ash to become the world’s second-largest economy in 30 years, threatening to overtake the US. Since then, China, South Korea, and India have risen.

Footage: Shutterstock

Inquiries: behindasian@gmail.com
Brought to you by the Behind Asian Team.