Why Japan’s PM Crossed China’s Red Line: History, Economics & Taiwan Crisis
Japan China tensions because there is a lot
to cover into this and given your background in history I figured I’ll we’ll start with uh
uh the island the history of the islands if you will be kind just to give my community a brief
understanding of how this came to be then we’ll move into the geopolitical aspect of the tensions
and the economic aspects of it if you would um well there is territorial dispute between China
and Japan in the East China Sea, over the Daoi Islands. Um, but the you know the the main issue
really is over Taiwan. uh you know all started with Taiwan and everything started with the Sino
first SinoJapanese war of 1894 and 1895 because the the the you know the the the Dawi islands what
Japanese call Sangaku they there were a group of uh uninhabited islands in the East China Sea.
Now up to China was the first one to map it, give it a name, Delu Islands. And then in
1885, this after Mei reform in Japan, Japan is starting to become uh industrial power. They were
thinking about annexing the island. The Japanese uh internal minister petitioned uh the Japanese
government to annex the island of Dyu Islands. But at the time the Japanese prime minister
Inu Inu said, “Well, okay, let’s let’s hold off for a second because you know the Chinese
map ch Chinese already given a Chinese name, Daoyu Island. They obviously claim it. Let’s not
cause our problem with China yet.” This was 1885, 10 years before the first SinoJapanese war.
So um and this is internal Japanese official government document. So they have they they
put off uh because they are afraid to you know challenging China’s claim. Then what happened
in 1894 1895 is that Japan defeated China in the first SinoJapanese war and then uh as a
result of that China have to seed the island of Taiwan to Japan as a Japanese colony. So at that
juncture, Taiwan sudden uh Japan suddenly claimed, “Oh, this group of islands, the Duo Islands, is
actually no man’s land.” Uh so it didn’t belong to anybody. We we’re going to formally incorporate it
into our territory. Um and but during the Japanese colonial rule of Taiwan, the set of island Ja
Island, it was administered from the Japanese colonial uh govern uh governorship of Taiwan
as part of Taiwan. Taiwan. Uh so by the way, the name the Japanese name Sangaku is actually a
literal translation from the English name Pinnacle Islands. You know, Singaku is a Japanese for
pinnacle, you know. So that gives you idea where how that name origin because the chi Chinese has
named the the the islands for uh you know since uh before the mean dynasty you know they they
have they put it on maps and everything and and so so so Japan they took uh they took the the
English name from the from the maps of Pinnacle Island they translate into Japanese and call it
Sangaku and now as the settlement of World War II, Japan was to supposed to give up Taiwan or all
its surrounding islands back to China. Now, from China’s perspective, that would have included
the Dao Islands and but what what what really happened was um United States was actually in
actual control of the islands. the US Navy was using it as a for target practice. Um and and so
this is something that’s was not challenged by uh the Jang Kai regime on Taiwan because you know
whatever Junka regime on Taiwan was a US client state. So he didn’t object to US um occupation
of the islands to use it for target practice. But what triggered this dispute was in 1971. Um
so so US actually occupied um the Okinawa island chain after World War II and it was governed
kind of under separately from Japan. And in 1971 the there was a decision whether um is Okinawa
should remain kind of under the as a as a as a US colony or should it be returned to Japan. Now,
Okinawa itself, the Rio Island chain itself also is actually tied to this dispute because um the
the Rio is the Japanese pronunciation of Luchu um which is what the island called themselves. Um the
Luchu island chain they used to be a independent kingdom and that has a very close diplomatic ties
with China. It was part of the Chinese tributary system and and and and through the Min andQin
dynasty. The Chinese emperors will routinely send envoy to the island to grand investature
which is to to officially confirm a new king of of Luchu. and Luchu also they con concluded their
own separate treaties with the United States when Commodore Perry sailed his black ship to East
Asia. Uh you know this is in the documents of US uh Congress and you know US had treaties
with Kingdom of Luchu. So what happened is in after magi restoration Japan you know became
expansionist power. So around 18770s uh empire of Japan officially annexed the kingdom kingdom
of Duduchu. So that’s when all these territory disputes start happening with China because before
Japan homeland did not border China directly right China’s the immediate neighbor was the kingdom
of Luchu which is already in a tributary uh uh status within within the Chinese imperial system.
So there was no dispute. There was no dispute about ownership of Daoyu Islands. Uh because
historically according to the the travel documents uh travelers between China and Luchu Islands,
they the the the the people say once they leave the water of Daoyu Island, then they’re heading
home to to Luchu Kingdom. and and so so because of Japan annexation of Luchu Island that’s how they
start to claim Du Island as part of the Oki no they’re rename so so the Japanese um also rename
uh you know first they they refer Luchu by the Japanese pronunciation Ryokyo Islands but they
but then they decide to rename the main island uh they decide to call Okinawa Okinawa Prefecture
and So the the the then the um but the islands for the whole entire period of the Japanese uh
colonization of Taiwan was administered from Taiwan, right? So so this is why from the Chinese
side you assume that Dawyu Island should have been returned with other islands around Taiwan to China
but it was not challenged again by the Jang Kai regime in Taiwan because you know US was a daddy
right? So you know US can can can make use of the island however they want. But in 1971 when United
States decide to return the Rio island chain to Taiwan to to Japan again uh at that time US put a
vote uh to the islanders. Um and the the islands, the people of Okinawa, they thought, you know, by
voting for return to Japanese rule that they will get rid of the American base, you know, because
their choice was whether to return remain under the American protectorship or return to Japan. And
so so many of them opted to uh for returning to Japan. But to their disappointment, um nothing
changed. the American military stay, you know, Okinawa. Uh, and and and so they’re they’re kind
of get um get punished uh uh they’re getting like a sort of double jeopardy. Um and but but the
but the the dispute arose when United States when they returned Rio Island uh administration
to Japan, they included the Dawyu Islands. So, so that’s when in 1971 both China uh mainland
China and the the the regime on Taiwan protested this handover of US. Now for for US government’s
official stance on this dispute, it officially takes no stance on the sovereignty issue of Da
Islands. But yet they still give it to Japan, handed the control over to Japan. And now um more
recently the the United States State Department actually said well even though we takes no stands
on the sovereignty of the Jawu Islands but since it’s under control of Japan it will still trigger
the Japan US security pack if you know China were to militarily uh uh take over that place. So, so,
so US is still militarily pledged to defend the Du Islands uh you know from China even though
it it is officially it takes no stands on the sovereignty dispute. So this again this is like
kind of strategic and built and United States intentionally kind of left a time bomb you know
like in the China US China Japan relationship uh because to let it continue to fester and and uh
so so right now um what we what we saw with a kind of increasing striden [ __ ] Japanese position
on Taiwan which is you know the Japanese prime minister basically ditched the whole decadel long
policy of and strategic ambiguity which is to say we you know for us the strategic ambiguity on
Taiwan is to neither confirm or deny that we’re going to come to we’re going to get involved in
a war uh over Taiwan over status of Taiwan um despite what Joe Biden said during his presidency
when was asked, “Will we defend Taiwan?” He said, “Yes.” But then the White House, you know, came
out and and and walked back to the statements like, “Yeah, Joe Biden didn’t know what he was
talking about. He was senile. Don’t worry about him.” But but but this this current prime minister
of Japan, you know, she’s definitely not a senile old man, right? I mean, there’s no pli plausible
deniability when she said what she had when she said. Yeah. and she for her part um this is a
long-term agenda for her. Yeah. Her her uh the the the particular faction of her party uh LDP because
she she belonged to a particular right wing of the LDP the Japanese ruling party which has ruled
Japan since most of the war post World War II. Now LDP itself is a pretty rightwing political
organization but she belong to the right wing of the right political party right so she’s like
really on the on the yeah yeah on the on the on the on the on the extreme part of the spectrum
and for the Japanese nationalist politicians like her their goal has always been quote unquote
return Japanese to the normal country status and what they consider normal country is Japanese
must have a military that they can deploy abroad. And this this has to do with the J Japanese Japan
peacetime constitution. Yeah. Which was reimposed on them by American after World War II which
says uh especially article nine of the peace constitutions which says Japan should not have a
military but you can maintain a self-defense force for the self-defense of the Japanese homeland home
islands and the Japanese right-wing politician did not like that at all. So they have do their done
their best try to skirt around the issue or or or overturn the article 9 of the peace constitution.
I mean they um you know back in the day of Shinszo a tried to like replace it completely um with with
by saying oh Japan should should be able to act like a normal country have its own military
and deploy wherever he wants. But the peace time peace constitution is so popular among
the Japanese general population because many rightfully saw it as a key cornerstone of [ __ ]
Japan’s post-war prosperity because they thought it was because the pivot away from militarism to
World War II that allowed Japan to achieve its uh mira economic miracle post war. So, so the
peace time constit peace constitution is still very popular on Japanese populace. So, the Shinszo
Abbe government decide, you know what, if we can’t get rid of it, we’ll just uh reinterpret it. We
just reinterpret what it means. So, so they they uh say okay well yes you know the idea is we have
to maintain a self-defense force to defend Japan but there will be some contingencies around the
neighborhood of Japan that will threaten Japan’s security in that case we should be allowed to
deploy our territory you know but even even in that like they were talking about Taiwan but
even back then they were very carefully not to explicitly spell out Taiwan even though that’s
what they meant. What they really meant was like, okay, if US were to get involved in in wars around
Japan as as a US ally, we’re obligated to help and that means we will have to send out our quote
unquote self-defense force to waters around Japan. But this this current prime minister uh Takichi,
she kind of dished away with all kind of pretense and say okay yeah if something happens in in Tai
around Taiwan that is the exist this existential threat to Japan which would necessitate us to
get militarily involved. Now what this m made this song especially grading into Chinese year
is because you know even before World War II from from like 193 from 1931 onwards the empire
of Japan has used the exact same excuse saying oh this we’re fighting for the exist this is an
existential issue for Japan this is why we need to send our troops to China right I mean like that
was a justification for their war of aggression against China. And and and now you know here
the same language and and the Japanese prime minister threatened to send their military to uh
to to to to waters uh what China consider its own territory. That’s that’s clearly unacceptable.
Um and this is why there was such a big issue uh right now that’s blowing up between China
and Japan. China depend demands the Japanese prime minister to retract her statement. Uh and
and now the the Japanese government is trying to wiggle their way out of it. Say like well by not
continue to make such statement we’re basically retracting like no no that’s not what retraction
means. That’s not what retract they learning from the Americans. So, so, so, so this is why this
dispute is ongoing uh between China and Japan. But I think there’s um some domestic reasons for
the Japanese prime minister to do what she did. And that’s because Japan is facing some serious
economic headwind right now. The Japanese economy is quietly imploding. Um this is driving the
Japanese interest rate up. um you know which is going to have a huge repercussion around the rest
of the world as well because uh for decades for many years Japanese central bank has been printing
a lot of money and they’re keeping the interest rate artificially low you know almost zero so then
a lot of Wall Street types they thought oh this is a perfect or arbitrage opportunity we can borrow
tons of Japanese yen uh at almost no interest rate and invest it in American stocks or or bonds
which yield higher returns and we just need the difference. It’s free money, right? So this is
called the yen carry trade which which involve tons of tons of money borrowing tons of tons of
Japanese yen and investing American assets. But now with sudden spikes in the Japanese interest
rate, all these people who borrow Japanese yen, many of them borrow with margins. And now suddenly
they realize, oh crap, we owe more we owe more money than we we borrow. So now they have to repay
back with higher interest. A lot of them will have to unwind this trade. That means they have to
start selling. Yeah. The American stocks. that to sell them the the US treasuries in order to pay
back the the the amount of the loans the Japanese yen they have loan. So this is gonna have a huge
repercussion on the on the American asset market as well. But but for Japan, you know, things
are not looking good. They they’re already being hurting under the Trump terror. They’re getting
because for unlike China, China has a continental size economy. um you know the export is really
like a small percentage of the Chinese GDP. Now for for Japan export is still a huge part of their
GDP because their their internal market is not big enough to absorb all their all all of their
production. So when US slap the tariff on Japanese automakers, this that is an existential issue and
and this is so Japanese economy is under all kind of pressure and this is why I think the Japanese
prime minister um you know want to distract his public from the very very real uh economic
implosion that’s facing by the the Japanese economy. right now. And at the same time, um, she
also is fulfilling the promise to her more, uh, extreme right supporters like, hey, I can be tough
on China. Look at me. I’m dishing away all the strategic ambiguity. I’m telling them, I’m we’re
going to deploy the Japanese military to the water of Taiwan. Um and so so this and and in addition
to that there’s another dimension is the Japan US security pack because the Japanese rightwing has
made that the cornerstone of their policy for the past few decades and they they thought that
you know because they have profited from it. Japan basically profited from being the junior
partner of the US empire in the East Asia. And what they saw as a result of the sheep b uh sheep
Trump meeting in in Korea was there’s a temporary truth in the tariff war and and they’re they’re
they’re reading the the the leaves to see which way the wind blows and it looks like US is doing
a temporary pivot from a direct confrontation with China to uh to consolidate its grips on
power elsewhere like Latin America or Africa, right? This is why Trump is talking about is now
concentrating on Venezuela. Now they’re talking about Christian genocide in Nigeria that they’re
going to uh you know possibly do a military intervention. And for Japan, that’s particularly
the Japanese right-wing politician. That’s bad news. If the US leaves, they will be the one
holding the bag to face the resurging China. They don’t want that. So this is a way to create
a crisis in order to drag United States back you know so so force the these western politician
come out and to say oh we’re in solidarity with Japan you know we we stand in support of Japan
against China right this it’s under this kind of a backdrop now gives a call to Takichi and and
which according to Wall Street Journal depending on how much you believe the Wall Street Journal
reporting nowadays is that Trump told Takichi to calm the f down, right? To to chill out. Um, and
I think that’s I think that is kind of the the the my reading of the whole whole uh uh rockus. Um but
I I think this is a this is a in a way what Japan is doing is not that dissimilar from what the
Europe is doing. You know when when the European leaders claiming oh you know what if the US is
going to wrap up the Ukraine war no no problem. We’re going to do it alone. We’re going to carry
on the burden of supplying Ukraine. I mean which is preposterous. Nobody believes that. But what
they’re really trying to do is try to prolong the the crisis. is trying to get drag United
States back in. You don’t they don’t want us to leave. So, they’re the ones holding the bag,
end up holding the bag. Um, so I think I think that’s what’s going on with Japan. Well, I’m I’m
glad you you addressed the the historical aspect, Carl, of the Daoyo Islands because a lot of people
do not know the background story of this. I had it on a good authority and I read some I saw as a
matter of fact I wish I could have kept a I saw a picture not a picture yeah a picture of sort from
an old archives from way back of where the island was part of China at at that time the the empires
and so forth and and that in itself later on the Japanese start to push against that one but it
was on the record there and I’m glad you explained this one at least from a historical perspective
One other thing I wanted to mention since you brought up the idea of of her being on the far
right. I I knew about her before she became I read something that you know she was a hawkish
Chinese hawkish. I had no idea why she will be till I found out that her protetéé was none other
than Shinszu Abi. And if we know the history of what happened between Shinszuabi and Chinese few
years ago when he went to the memorial place, you remember that incident, right? You know,
and that right there. I put the two together and figured she’s not up to anything good. And and and
there’s a lot of I mean, and and she is part of the Japanese rightwing that is in active support
of historical revisionism. Uh because recently Takichi visited Malaysia, right? and and first
she went to pay respect to a a cemetery of the Japanese soldiers fallen in the Malaya campaign
in Malaysia. And then she went to Okay. Okay. So, she’s Japanese. She she should do that. Yeah.
Okay. Whatever. So then but then she went to visit to another memorial which was uh erected to uh the
British uh uh uh to under during the Malayan in um emergency. Now the Malayan emergency was
anticolonial war when the [ __ ] when the British were trying to trying to maintain their
control over the the their colony of British Malaya which at that time it was between the
British colonial uh authority and the Malayan uh Communist Party right and and the Malayan
Communist Party now it’s it’s has a very heavy ethnic ethnic Chinese component. And this is
because the Malayan Communist Party came into being during the resistance against the Japanese
colonial rule during World War II. You know, when Japan first came to take over Southeast
Asia during after Pearl Harbor, uh the the the Imperial Japanese armies specifically singled out
ethnic Chinese in Southeast Asia because a lot of these ethnic Chinese, they have been in support
of their homeland struggle against the Japanese aggression. You know, they’ve been sending a
lot of money. Some of them even volunteer to go back to China to fight the Japanese. So when when
Japan took over Southeast Asia, they specifically targeted the Chinese community in Southeast Asia,
whether in British Malaya, Singapore or or or or uh or Dut Dutch East Indies and and so this caused
a lot of these uh ethnic Chinese population to join the resistance against the Japanese and and
and you know at that time was led by the the the the Malayan Communist Party. party and and so
but after the war after Japan Japanese Japanese surrender you know initially the British supported
the theurgency against Japan but when the British came back it’s like British like okay you you
communist have to give up your weapons you know so so so this this started the the the anti-colonial
string and called the Malayan insurgency and and so Takiichi knew uses history yet he went to the
the the memorial to the British soldiers in the Malayan insurgency and and then what she’s trying
to do is trying to link up the the two. It’s like, hey, look, look, we we the Japanese and we the,
you know, the the Western Democratic allies. See, we fought on the same side. We we fought those
commi Chinese. You see, we’re the we’re part of the same struggle. We’re just complete uh
historical revisionism of what happened in World War II, right? I mean like and but but but but
that’s that’s the type of the you know kind of the party ideology she represent. She’s appealing
to kind of the the comm anti-communism part of the west to see hey look we we’re actually
we’re actually allies together in this. Um, so yeah. Yeah. So, so, so this this is yeah,
it’s very unfortunate that um, you know, she this is going to throw a wrench into the into
the China Japan relationship for a long time. Um, you know, I just don’t see how this is going to
resolve anytime soon. For sure. I mean, to me, Carl, it shows literally lack of diplomatic
maturity. That’s basically where I how would I put it for a prime minister and and knowing and I
am sure she does knowing the history of what took place in Nin for example 19 from what 1931 all
the way to 1945 I mean yeah I was there I went on the ground I went and I saw those images in
the museum I mean heartbreaking I can’t even talk much about all that uh just the idea of a prime
minister will provoke another country that never forget the scars. You know, you’re talking about
ancestors of Chinese people that been sacrificing and and been sacrificed and been been sort of
died in a horrible manners. But and just for her to come and say that that way, that’s just
to me. Let alone when you look at the history of Japanese prime ministers, none of them to my
knowledge, none of them ever crossed that red line publicly. Never. to my knowledge, Shinszu AB did
what he did with the memorial visits and so forth. I want to tackle one aspect of this beside the
geopolitical aspect because we’re going to talk about the Chinese response from the bigger picture
and we’ll get into that. uh for now I wanted to ask from an economic perspective did Japan think
did this prime minister Sani Takashi did she think about the economic consequences give knowing for
example and I’ll give the example of rare earth elements Japan doesn’t produce rare earth elements
Japan doesn’t process rare earth elements and it has an electronic capacity production which needs
access to rare earth elements China is going to cut off that that’s it Why why they didn’t think
in terms of an economic pro implications of such provocation in your opinion? Well, I don’t think
these politicians really care about economics. I mean, why why why did Trump start launch
the trade war, right? I mean, like, right, right. the the I think they’re more uh concerned
about in in immediate terms, you know, whether to win popular support among their voter base,
whether to uh curry favor with their uh you know, um with their their master in Washington or
whether to uh maintain their their hold on power. I think that’s more uh uh has more priority
than you know how the economy is is going because Japanese economy already took a immediate hit when
uh you know se Japanese GDP 7% of Japanese GDP is tourism and Chinese tourists represent one of the
largest segment of tourists coming to Japan and so you know they only second after South Korea so so
a lot of the Japanese uh Chinese tourists already cancelled their flights to Tokyo, their their
planned vacation. So that’s going to hit a lot of the the Japanese economy immediately. And then
there was reporting of Japan trying to seek US help in furthering semiconductor sanction against
China. There’s a lot Japanese Yeah, there’s a lot of Japanese company that’s supplying components,
semiconductor production components to China. So they thought, okay, but we cannot do it alone.
We’re going to need the help of United States. But again, China already show they have the
ultimate trump card which is real earth. You know, they cut off the real earth. That’s it. There’s
no there’s no there’s no more indust modern industrial production. And and I think uh you
know, Trump understood that. Trump understood that after the trade war when when China start to
playing the real earth card. Um and I think Japan is gonna have to learn the hard way. Yeah,
for sure. I uh there there is one one aspect of one behavior from the governor of Taiwan
uh what’s his name Lee Chang I think he was eating some sushi or something just to agitate
the Chinese because what he was saying is that hey I’m gonna be I know I know Carl I saw that
and I was like what the heck what’s wrong with this guy they just fire they just lifted the ban
on Japanese food seafood just after this incident, right? Taiwan had maintained a ban on Japanese
seafood since the Fukushima incident up till now. And now the the quote unquote president of Taiwan
trying to cash on some points by lifting the the the the the Taiwan ban on Japanese seafood and he
publicly went on eating the the the seafood from Japan. That that reminds me of that Obama, you
know, drinking the water from Flint, Michigan. You’re That’s a good one. Obama did. Yeah,
I remember that. And uh and but this is this is not going to make a dent. You know, the
the level of seafood import from Japan to Taiwan. That doesn’t even compare to the the
amount the Chinese market consumes. You know, the the largest market is still China. There’s
no way they’re gonna make up for the loss of the Chinese market. Uh, you know, like no matter
how much Fukushima sushi you’re gonna consume, it’s not gonna compete with with the amount
that that that that you lost uh, you know, by losing the Chinese market just like the
American soybean farmer found out. Oh yeah. Now the farmers are pissed here. I mean, once again,
as I mentioned, the media is not disclosing, but the farmers are pissed at Trump. So forget
about now no they don’t care for because the livelihood as a matter of fact Carl I did read
through a private investigator he’s not affiliated with any I wish I could have kept the link I
read that some farmers here are now taking their own lives I was heartbroken when I when I read
that I was you know I can only imagine a farmer taking his own life leaving a family behind
but because he couldn’t take it anymore with losing their because the Chinese not buying their
stuff anymore and because Trump caused that one. So straightforward that that kind of news you
you only read before from like India you know like there like a lot of news report of Indian
farmers commit suicide because pushed by dad yeah by by dad. But now now man like United States
is becoming country it’s so sad. It’s so sad. So,
📖 In this episode, Dr David Oualaalou and Carl Zha dive deep into the escalating tensions between China and Japan. Starting with the often-overlooked history of the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands, the discussion traces the dispute from the First Sino-Japanese War (1894-95) to the 1971 U.S. handover to Japan. We then analyze Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s recent, explicit threats to deploy Japan’s military to the Taiwan Strait, breaking decades of “strategic ambiguity.” The conversation explores the domestic economic crisis in Japan, the strategic motives behind this provocation, and the severe potential economic consequences, including China’s control over critical rare earth elements.
✨ Key Takeaways:
Historical Root: The Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands dispute originates in 1895, when Japan annexed them after defeating China and colonizing Taiwan. The islands were administered from Taiwan, which China argues means they should have been returned post-WWII.
A Deliberate “Time Bomb”: The U.S. fueled the dispute in 1971 by transferring administrative control of the islands to Japan while officially taking “no stance” on sovereignty—yet still pledging to defend them under the U.S.-Japan Security Treaty.
End of Strategic Ambiguity: PM Takaichi’s explicit statement that a Taiwan contingency is an “existential threat” to Japan marks a radical shift. This mirrors Imperial Japan’s pre-WWII rhetoric for invading China and is a major red line for Beijing.
Domestic & Strategic Motives: Takaichi’s provocation serves to distract from Japan’s imploding economy (threatened by Trump’s tariffs and the unraveling Yen carry trade) and to “drag the U.S. back” to Asia, preventing America from pivoting to other theaters like Latin America.
Economic Reckoning: Japan is economically vulnerable. China is its largest tourist market and controls the rare earth supply chain vital for Japan’s tech industry. Provocations risk severe, immediate economic retaliation.
🕓 Chapters / Timestamps:
00:00 – Intro: The Historical & Geopolitical Storm
00:29 – The True Origin: How Taiwan Led to the Diaoyu Islands Dispute
02:20 – 1895: Japan’s Annexation & the Link to Taiwanese Administration
03:49 – Post-WWII: U.S. Occupation & The 1971 Handover That Sparked the Crisis
06:14 – The Ryukyu/Luchu Kingdom: The Historical Buffer Japan Absorbed
09:06 – U.S. Double Game: “No Stance” on Sovereignty, But a Military Pledge to Japan
10:32 – Takaichi Crossing Red Line: Ditching “Strategic Ambiguity” on Taiwan
12:20 – Japanese Right-Wing Agenda: “Normalizing” the Military & Revising Article 9
15:36 – Eerie Echoes of Imperial Japan’s “Existential Threat” Justification
16:59 – The Economic Trigger: Japan’s Imploding Economy & The Yen Carry Trade Unwind
19:18 – Why Provoking China is a Dangerous Distraction from Domestic Crisis
21:13 – The Fear of U.S. Pivot: Japan Creating a Crisis to “Drag America Back”
22:10 – Report: Trump Tells Kishida to “Chill Out”
23:07 – Takaichi’s Revisionism: Malaysia Visit Tries to Re-write WWII History
28:22 – Lack of Diplomatic Maturity: Ignoring Historical Scars like Nanjing
29:49 – The Economic Consequences: Rare Earths, Tourism & Semiconductor Sanctions
32:38 – Taiwan’s Symbolic Gesture (& Why It Doesn’t Replace the Chinese Market)
34:06 – Parallel: The Human Cost of Trade Wars on U.S. Farmers
💬 Let’s Discuss:
Do you think Prime Minister Takaichi’s break from “strategic ambiguity” is a calculated strategy or a dangerous miscalculation?
How vulnerable is Japan’s economy to Chinese countermeasures, and what would be the most effective response from China?
Is the U.S. strategy of “strategic ambiguity” in the Asia-Pacific still sustainable, or is a clearer stance inevitable?
#ChinaJapan #DiaoyuIslands #Taiwan #Geopolitics
29 Comments
The Chinese government's recent unreasonable criticism of Japan appears arbitrary and disregards the facts. The Chinese side either misunderstands or deliberately misrepresents the meaning of the ‘life-and-death crisis situation’ explained by the Japanese Prime Minister in the Diet. This ‘life-and-death crisis situation’ merely signifies that the Japanese government can exercise the right of collective self-defence jointly with the US military only if it recognises such a situation. The Chinese government appears to misunderstand that Japan could unilaterally use force to defend Taiwan. Under current Japanese domestic law, overseas military deployment is not permitted except when based on a UN resolution. Support for US forces is only authorised within the scope of collective self-defence rights stipulated in the Japan-US Security Treaty, and even then it is strictly limited to the minimum necessary. Without coordination with US forces under the collective self-defence rights of the Japan-US Security Treaty, ‘Japan exercising force unilaterally to defend another country’ is legally taboo and politically impossible. China's criticism stems from ignorance of Japan's legal system and constitutes an unrealistic and highly dangerous assertion based on misguided perceptions.
Takaichi is playing tough to boast her status as a clown!
The evil behind is American
The Japanese massacred tens of millions of Chinese during WW2. China won't accept that ever again.
Gracias Carl y amigos .
We all know that China is really the one Who’s crossing the line.
China should do a militarily takeover of the Diaoyu islands, just to set an example. If the Japanese dare to do something about it, then it's game on.
China wouldn't go to war with Japan over this. But it certainly will seize this opportunity to justify economic actions against Japan that will hurt it a lot.
What if in a plot twist, Sanae is China's spy/puppet? Designed to destroy Japan Internally? Kill the economy first? or perhaps, SANAE is some descendant of one of the fallen Japanese army in Malaya (anyone checked her background?) and she goes to Malaysia during the ASEAN Summit (less obvious) to pay respect to perhaps her Grandfather or Great Grandfather and vouched to finish what they have started? 🤔🤔🤔🤨🤨🤨
Taiwan is already China. What is the problem with Japan's early aggression and the efforts of the Chinese people to take back Taiwan? I would like to ask Japan, do you want to be a robber? does your country have to go everywhere to seize it if you don't concentrate on developing the economy?
Taiwan is already China. What is the problem with Japan's early aggression and the efforts of the Chinese people to take back Taiwan? I would like to ask Japan, do you want to be a robber? does your country have to go everywhere to seize it if you don't concentrate on developing the economy?
The backwardness of Japan is the result of backwardness by robbing others of labor. this is a shameful act of robbers, and this is not an honor for you. It is a shame for the whole country.
The backwardness of Japan is the result of backwardness by robbing others of labor. this is a shameful act of robbers, and this is not an honor for you. It is a shame for the whole country.
PLAYING WITH FIRE,MAY CAUSE ONE TO GET BURNT.JAPAN PM,big mistake with CHINA/TAIWAN issue.
Great talks, Carl and Dr Oualaalou! Thanks for sharing!
Trump gave instructions to its dog in the East. You keep China busy, and threaten to start a proxy war…..in exchange for lower tariffs.
TESTING , MILITARY READINESS/ REACTION another side of the coin
now that china more or less ready , Senkoku/daiyo after ww2 , it is returned to china and then 1980 something Japan claim with US help?????
The American people don't have any idea where Taiwan even is located. And I don't see the people ever agreeing to send American soldiers to die for Taiwan.
Seems wherever the CIA goes, the fasc*sts follow. Zionaziland, Ukronaziland, and now f*scist Japan.
https://youtu.be/vrj1FXwgcMQ?si=_uF2wm3X39-JLRTS
This could have everyone to understand the cruel atrocities Japan committed in China and Asia as well as to the western prisoner of war since it started it's military invasion of the world even before the WWII.
@ 0:53 , when asked about Japan’s recent provocative comment, Carl likes to discuss China-Taiwan history. Carl is taking the long road home. The real culprit is the USA. Without USA backstopping Japan, PM Takaichi would not make such controversy. Under the Unconditional Surrender of Japan Treaty Japan became a vassal of USA at best, a colony at worst. Under either status Japan’s foreign policy must dovetail with USA’s— especially in regard to China.
Genocidal War Criminal Genocidal Japan, responsible for over 35 million Chinese deaths in WWII, continues to evade accountability by rewriting history—rebranding its atrocities as acts of liberation with the support of its master, the world terrorist USA. Instead of justice, the perpetrators of Unit 731 were absorbed into U.S. bioweapons programs, perpetuating war crimes under the guise of science, in clear violation of postwar agreements with the Soviet Union should have stay in 125BC and should have never restablish I hope the god would punish Not only Israeli but all the countries whom have helped committing GENOCIDE like world terrorist USA, EU, UK & Genocidal War Criminal Japan
Japan just lost Ryukyu.
China has waited 80 years to get revenge for the people slaughtered by the japs in Nanjing massacre and Hong Kong. Now is all system go.
CCP and China nationals are committing crimes all over the world.
They need to be stopped and arrested!!
Senkaku Islands is an inseparable part of Japan.
There is no such thing as this dumb Diaooo yoo
To all the people who thinks Japan is being forced by US, forgets that Japan was willing and eager to be allied with the Nazis in WW2 and the war crimes are written in all East Asia history.
Before the Tiananmen Square incident, the Chinese government, whose national power was still developing, advocated a future-oriented approach, trumpeting, "Fifty years is but a moment in the 5,000-year history of Japan and China. Let's not dwell on the past, but let's join hands and develop together toward the future." However, after the Tiananmen Square incident, the Communist government, alarmed by the public's discontent directed toward the Communist government, decided to direct this discontent toward other countries. Japan became an obvious target. From then on, the Chinese Communist government began its despicable propaganda campaign criticizing Japan's militaristic past.