Japan Took Thailand’s $12B Rail Deal From China… And Still Failed 10 Years Later!

Imagine boarding a train that travels faster than a small airplane, gliding quietly across cities at 350 kmh. No long waits, no traffic, just sleek, efficient motion, like something from a sci-fi movie. But this isn’t the future. This is China right now. Over the past two decades, China has built something extraordinary. The largest, fastest, and most advanced high-speed rail network on Earth. It spans over 40,000 km, enough to circle the entire planet. Trains leave every few minutes. Delays are rare and accidents almost non-existent. This incredible success has done more than connect Chinese cities. It’s inspired a global movement. Countries from Southeast Asia to Africa are asking, “Can we build this, too?” Many are eager to modernize, boost tourism, cut carbon emissions, and link remote regions with their capitals, just like China did. One of those countries is Thailand. Back in 2013, Thailand made a bold promise to build its own high-speed rail line from Bangkok to Chiang Mai, covering nearly 700 km. It would be a gamecher, reducing a grueling 8-hour drive to just 3 hours, millions of passengers, billions in economic value. But here’s the twist. When Thailand had to choose who would build this ambitious project, it faced two options: China or Japan. two of the most powerful players in global rail technology. In the end, Thailand made a choice that seemed logical at the time, but led to years of regret. Because when it comes to highspeed rail, the partner you choose can change everything. So, what went wrong and what could have been? Let’s find out. To understand what Thailand passed up, we need to look at what China has actually achieved because it’s nothing short of historic. In just over 15 years, China built the largest highspeed rail network in the world. more than 42,000 kilometers as of 2024. That’s more than all other countries combined. Trains regularly hit 350 km per hour, connecting major cities like Beijing, Shanghai, Guanghou, and Shenzhen in just a few hours. And they’re not just fast, they’re punctual. Chinese bullet trains are on time more than 99% of the time. Even more impressive, the safety record. In all those years, and with billions of passengers moved, China’s high-spe speed rail system has maintained an incredibly low accident rate, among the safest in the world. This wasn’t just luck. It came from tight coordination, cutting edge engineering, and massive government investment. And the benefits don’t stop at convenience. High-speed rail transformed China’s economy. It opened up smaller cities to tourism, brought rural regions into the modern economy, and drastically cut down on air pollution by replacing thousands of short hall flights and car trips. In fact, cities connected by high-spe speed rail saw their GDP growth rise faster than those without it. This kind of success didn’t go unnoticed. Countries around the world like Indonesia, Egypt, Hungary, and even some in Latin America started working with Chinese companies to bring this technology home. China began exporting not just its trains but also its entire rail building ecosystem. Engineers, designers, planning teams, and long-term support. In short, when countries want high-spe speed rail that’s fast, affordable, and gets done on time, China became the obvious go-to. So, when Thailand decided to build its own network, choosing China would have made perfect sense. But that’s not what happened. Let’s dive into Thailand’s highspeed rail dream and how it started with big hopes and a 12 billion budget. Thailand had a vision, one that could reshape the country’s transportation forever. In the early 2010s, the Thai government announced plans for a 680 km highspeed rail line connecting the capital Bangkok to the northern city of Chiang Mai. This wasn’t just about faster travel. It was about national progress. The idea was bold. take an eight-hour car journey and turn it into a three-hour smooth train ride. Each train would carry up to 800 passengers at a time, zipping through the heart of the country. For tourists, it meant easier access to scenic northern Thailand. For locals, it promised better jobs, easier commutes, and stronger links between regions. Economically, this project was a gamecher. Thailand planned to invest over $12 billion into it, hoping the line would boost trade, reduce congestion, and spark development along the rail corridor. Industrial zones, tech parks, new towns, all these were expected to emerge around the new stations. But there was more to it than economics. This rail project was also about prestige. Southeast Asia was entering a new era of infrastructure, and Thailand didn’t want to be left behind. A successful high-spe speed rail system would show the world that Thailand was ready to lead in modern transport just like Japan once did and China is doing now. Naturally, such a massive project needed the right partner. And that’s where the competition began. Two giants stepped forward. China and Japan. Both had the experience. Both had the technology. Both had something to prove. What happened next became a turning point in Thailand’s infrastructure journey. Let’s break down the bidding war and why Thailand ended up choosing a path that would cost them more than just money. When it came time to choose a partner for the Bangkok Chiang Mai high-speed rail, Thailand found itself in the middle of a highstakes showdown between two global heavyweights, China and Japan. Both countries had strong credentials. China came with the advantage of scale and speed. They had just built the largest high-spe speed rail network in the world, connecting massive distances across diverse landscapes. Their rail tech was fast, efficient, and tested under real world conditions. And most importantly, they had just completed several successful international projects like the one in Ethiopia and ongoing work in Indonesia. Japan, on the other hand, had history on its side. After all, they invented the world’s first bullet train, the Shinkconen, back in 1964. It had a long-standing reputation for safety, precision, and cuttingedge engineering. But in recent decades, Japan’s momentum had slowed. Few major international rail projects had been completed under Japanese partnerships. Still, both countries were eager to secure this Thai contract. It wasn’t just about business. It was about influence in Southeast Asia. Winning the project meant strengthening political ties, expanding tech exports, and building a legacy. Then came the twist. Japan decided to play hard ball. In a surprising move, they slashed their price by 18%, undercutting China’s bid. It was an aggressive tactic. Some even called it unsustainable. But it worked. Thai officials, under pressure to keep costs down, awarded the contract to Japan. At first glance, it looked like a win for everyone. Japan got the deal, Thailand got a better price, and China, well, they moved on to other projects. But underneath that discounted offer were consequences no one saw coming. Technical trade-offs, slower train speeds, poorer materials, and a construction timeline that would go from months to years to over a decade of delays. The lower price tag, it turns out, came with a much higher cost. Let’s look at how this decision unraveled and how Thailand’s dream project slowly turned into a frustrating, unfinished mess. What was supposed to be a smooth ride into the future quickly turned into a long, frustrating detour. After Japan won the contract for Thailand’s high-speed rail project, things started going wrong almost immediately. First, the train speed was cut. Originally promised at 300 km per hour, Japan proposed lowering it to just 180 kmh, nearly half the speed. This alone defeated much of the project’s original purpose, fast, competitive travel. Suddenly, the time savings weren’t as impressive, and public excitement began to fade. Then came the design problems. Reports revealed that Japan repeatedly changed the blueprints during the early stages of construction. Each change meant more delays, more back and forth approvals, and more confusion on the ground. The once tight schedule began to unravel. As construction slowly moved forward, costs began to balloon. Materials became more expensive, especially as global steel prices fluctuated. Labor costs in Thailand rose, too. But the biggest shock came when lowquality steel, reportedly shipped from Japan, was flagged for safety concerns. Thai engineers and media outlets raised alarms. If the materials were substandard, could the rail be trusted at all? That’s when the project truly began to stall. Thailand was stuck. If they walked away from the contract, they’d owe millions in cancellation penalties. But continuing meant sinking more money into a project that had already fallen years behind schedule with no clear end in sight. To make matters worse, the public grew restless. Every year that passed without progress chipped away at trust. both in Japan’s promises and in the Thai government’s decision to go with the cheaper option. By 2024, a full decade after the contract was signed, the rail line was still incomplete. Not a single passenger had boarded. Not a single train had made the journey from Bangkok to Chiang Mai, and the few completed sections failed to meet expectations, both in speed and safety. What began as a 12 billion dollar leap into the future had turned into a slow motion policy failure. And all the while, another country nearby was finishing its own high-speed rail on time and with a different partner. Let’s take a look at what could have been if Thailand had chosen China instead. While Thailand’s high-speed rail dreams were stuck in limbo, Indonesia, Thailand’s neighbor and regional competitor, made a very different choice. And it paid off. Indonesia decided to partner with China to build the Jakarta Bandung high-speed rail, a 142 kmter line connecting two major cities on the island of Java. The terrain was challenging. Volcanic soil, frequent rain, and hilly landscapes. All things that could have slowed construction or raised costs dramatically, but China handled it. By 2023, despite the obstacles, the project was completed and operational. Trains now run at speeds of 350 kilometers per hour, slashing travel time from over 3 hours down to just 40 minutes. It became Southeast Asia’s first high-speed rail line and a symbol of Indonesia’s leap forward. The key difference, China’s full package approach. China didn’t just supply trains. They brought engineers, construction teams, financing, and long-term maintenance support. They adapted their designs to local conditions, trained Indonesian workers, and worked around tough terrain instead of using it as an excuse to slow things down. Meanwhile, Thailand looked on, watching Indonesia zoom ahead while their own rail project remained unfinished and off track. And Indonesia wasn’t the only one. Egypt, Laos, and Serbia all signed high-speed rail deals with China. Even Europe, once skeptical, is now working with Chinese firms on certain segments of its rail network. On the flip side, countries that chose Japan, like India, have seen similar delays, inflated budgets, and unfulfilled promises. By 2024, Malaysia and Singapore officially dropped plans to involve Japan in their joint highspeed rail project. Why? Because they didn’t want to repeat Thailand’s mistake. All of this paints a clear picture when it comes to getting high-speed rail built fast and on budget, China has proven itself time and again. And while Thailand debated, delayed, and disputed, other countries just got it done. Now, let’s bring the story home. What lessons can we learn from Thailand’s decade long detour? Thailand set out to build a national landmark, a high-speed rail line that would connect cities, boost its economy, and inspire Southeast Asia. But after more than 10 years, the tracks are still unfinished. The trains aren’t running, and the dream is far from reality. Why? Because when the moment of decision came, Thailand chose the lower bid over the better builder. Japan’s discounted offer looked good on paper, but behind that discount were trade-offs in speed, quality, and accountability. What seemed like a bargain turned into a decade of delays, mounting costs, and national frustration. Meanwhile, other countries that placed their trust in China have already finished their rail lines. They’re moving forward while Thailand is still stuck negotiating blueprints and fixing problems that never should have existed in the first place. This isn’t just about trains. It’s about how critical infrastructure decisions shape the future of nations. Choosing the right partner, one with a proven record of delivery, adaptability, and reliability can save years, billions of dollars, and public trust. So now Thailand is left wondering, what if we had chosen China instead? Would passengers already be riding comfortably from Bangkok to Chiang Mai? Would businesses be booming along the corridor? Would Thailand now be seen as a regional model of success instead of a warning? That’s the real cost of a wrong partner. If you found this story eye opening, make sure to like, subscribe, and share this video. And we want to hear from you. Which country do you think is more trustworthy when it comes to building mega projects, China or Japan? Let us know in the comments below. Thanks for watching and we’ll see you in the next one.

Experience the incredible speed and efficiency of China’s high-speed trains as we explore the world’s largest high-speed rail network and its global influence. Discover Thailand’s ambitious plan for a Bangkok–Chiang Mai high-speed rail and the critical bidding war between China and Japan that shaped its future. Learn how Indonesia’s partnership with China led to the successful Jakarta–Bandung high-speed rail, while Thailand faced delays and setbacks with Japan—highlighting the challenges of choosing the right partner for mega infrastructure projects. Has Thailand missed out on transformative progress? Let us know your thoughts on China vs. Japan in high-speed rail projects! If you enjoyed this video, please like and share it.

#HighSpeedRail #ChinaTrain #ThailandRail #Infrastructure #JapanVsChina #GlobalDevelopment
See Less
OUTLINE:
00:00:00
China’s High-Speed Rail Revolution

00:00:53
Thailand’s High-Speed Rail Dream

00:04:56
China vs. Japan

00:07:32
A Costly Decision and Its Fallout

00:09:49
What If Thailand Chose China?

00:11:58
Lessons from Thailand’s Detour

00:13:27
Conclusion & Your Thoughts

19 Comments

  1. When you compromise with price you also do with quality. Looks like Thailand might have to get China to finish the project. Thailand will end up eating humble pie.

  2. Exactly, the same as in Vietnam, Japan took the contract to build North South High Speed Rail for Vietnam from 2010. However, no km was there

  3. Japan, a member of the G7 is doing this on purpose,
    to slow down the growth of all South East Asian countries !!!
    To make South East Asian countries a slave of the G7 !!!
    Not only in Thailand but also in India !!!

    Japan will first tempt you with all kinds of sweet promises
    and later once the agreement is signed
    then Japan will do "monkey business" to not fulfill it !!!

    Indonesia, with President Jokowi was smart enough to see
    through Japan bad intention !!
    Now Indonesia is the ONLY country in South East Asian with
    HIGH SPEED RAIL built by China with FULL support !!!

    And Indonesia' economy, NOW is growing faster
    than all countries in South East Asia

  4. Yes. India, Malaysia, Vietnam and offcourse Thailand all got screwed by Japan in awarding HS rail to Japan. These 4 countries should have put in written contract a clause that Japan will be responsible financially for delay and cost overrun, a form of FIX COST CONTRACT or no go for it.

  5. The story is not eye-opening because some of us (in the know) already knew the outcome of partnering with Japan 15 years ago. Japan was secretly paid by US to slow down developments of Asian countries, and therefore has its job to do and it's not a surprise that such projects are delayed.

  6. It has nothing to do with Japan or China. It's the mentality and behavior of the (corrupt) bureaucratic pencil pushers. No one in the world does anything for anyone else without earning something in return—be it money or prestige, which can easily be converted into money.

    Laos, for example, has a high-speed railway and a debt of $12 billion, with a population of 6 million. In plain English: every Laotian owes China $2,000. The Laos-China Railway Company holds 30% of the shares, while Chinese state-owned enterprises hold the remaining 70%. This means Laos is only a minor shareholder… you can figure out the rest.

    In Indonesia, things are a bit better: The Jakarta-Bandung high-speed railway is owned and operated by a joint venture called PT Kereta Cepat Indonesia China (PT KCIC). This joint venture includes both Indonesian and Chinese state-owned enterprises. The Indonesian consortium holds 60% of the project, while the Chinese partners control the remaining 40%. And PT-KCIC's debt: a $4.55 billion loan from the state-owned China Development Bank.

    Americans like to say "TANSTAAFL" (There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch) – a common phrase and economic proverb that means nothing is truly free.