Dopo il rifiuto della Cina, l’India vuole acquistare i treni ad alta velocità della serie E10 dal…

Dopo il rifiuto della Cina, l’India vuole acquistare i treni ad alta velocità della serie E10 dal…

In 2015, India announced something bold. A high-speed rail line connecting Mumbai to Ahmedabad. A shiny bullet train racing at over 300 kilometers per hour. A 14 billion dollar project meant to redefine travel in India and signal to the world, we’ve arrived. But a decade later, that dream hasn’t just stalled. It’s stuck in neutral. What began as a symbol of progress is now a cautionary tale. A project that promised Japanese precision and Indian ambition, but instead delivered delay, dysfunction, and diplomatic awkwardness. And here’s the kicker. By 2024, the cost ballooned to nearly 100 billion. And India, desperate to rescue the project, openly invited China to step in. China, the undisputed world leader in highspeed rail. And China said, “No, imagine that.” The country building 3,000 km of highspeed rail every year didn’t want India’s mega project. So here’s the question. How did one of India’s most ambitious infrastructure dreams become so complicated, so messy that even China with all its rail expertise walked away? Let’s rewind to where it all began. The idea wasn’t just about one train line. Back in 2012, India unveiled an audacious plan called the diamond quadrilateral, a network of high-spe speed rail corridors connecting the four mega cities, Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, and Kolkata. Think of it as India’s version of Japan’s Shinkansen or China’s vast bullet train system. But before running full speed into the future, India needed to test the waters. So, it picked a 58 km stretch between Mumbai and Amedabad as its pilot project. This route made sense. a busy business corridor, heavy daily traffic, and potential to cut travel time from seven hours to just under three. At first, India kept its options open. It signed a memorandum with China in 2013 to study feasibility. Germany, France, and Spain also showed interest. But then came Japan. In 2015, Japan made an offer India couldn’t refuse. $14 billion in funding, 0.1% interest loan, 80% of project cost covered, repayment over 50 years with a 15-year grace period, and access to their legendary Shinkinson technology. It was more than a financial deal. It was a soft power play. Japan saw an opportunity to deepen strategic ties and showcase its rail expertise in a rising global market. For India, this wasn’t just a train. It was a symbol of arrival, a chance to leapfrog into the League of Modern Nations with cuttingedge infrastructure. The vision was grand. The plan was locked. The money was ready. What could possibly go wrong? With Japan on board and the blueprint in place, the Mumbai Amedabad bullet train was supposed to be operational by 2022. But instead of breaking speed records, the project barely left the station by 2022, 5 years after it was green lit. Here’s what had actually happened. Only 30% of the required land had been acquired. Less than 10 kilometers of track had been constructed and the project’s overall completion just 25.6% as of 2024. Why? Because building a bullet train in India is not just about engineering. It’s about navigating red tape, legal loopholes, and public resistance. The biggest roadblock, land acquisition. Over 1,400 hectares were needed. But India’s land is deeply personal, passed down through generations. Every stretch acquired sparked protests, compensation battles, and political fingerpointing. Some villagers feared displacement. Others accused the government of lowballing compensation. Court cases dragged on for months. State governments were often not on the same page with the central government, especially in Maharashtra. While Japan’s Shinkansen was once built in less than 5 years, India took nearly that long just to get people to agree on where the train would go. The result, a project once seen as futuristic began to look like yet another Indian infrastructure headache. A high-speed train stuck in slow motion. And delays didn’t just frustrate people at home. They rattled India’s international image. Japan, known for precision and timelines, found itself mired in a process it couldn’t control. The clock was ticking, costs were rising, and confidence falling. And that’s when India started looking for help elsewhere, even to China. By late 2024, the Mumbai Ahmedabad highspeed rail wasn’t just delayed. It was desperate. Construction was crawling. Deadlines had become jokes. Costs had ballooned from 14 billion to nearly 100 billion. So, India did something unexpected. It invited the world back to the table, including the one country it had originally sidestepped, China. China is the undisputed king of highspeed rail. In just over a decade, it built over 40,000 km of bullet train lines, more than the rest of the world combined. India figured, “Maybe we put politics aside. Maybe China can save this.” But what happened next was shocking. China said no. And so did most other countries. Why would China, a nation eager for influence, walk away from a 100 billion deal? Because it wasn’t just about money. It was about trust, terms, and India’s track record. Let’s break it down. First, India’s demands were extreme. India wanted local manufacturing of trains, interestf free loans, technology transfers, and 50% localization even before basic rail systems were in place. To foreign investors, this looked less like a partnership and more like a one-sided wish list. Second, policy flip-flops. India has a history of retroactive taxes, changing project terms midway, and dragging legal disputes for years. For a high-speed rail project, where long-term stability is key, that’s a giant red flag. Third, too many cooks. Unlike China’s top- down execution model, India’s projects often involve state governments, federal agencies, courts, contractors, all pulling in different directions. Foreign firms saw a risk they couldn’t control. And most importantly, India burned bridges before. Back in 2015, India chose Japan over China for this exact project. Now, nearly a decade later, it was asking China to salvage it. That didn’t go over well in Beijing. So, in the end, India stood at the crossroads of its most ambitious project and no one wanted to join the ride. Even China with its appetite for global infrastructure dominance walked away. Why did China say no? Because trust is harder to build than tracks. With options closing and pressure rising, India turned back to the only partner still standing, Japan. But even that partnership was about to get risky. With China out in a no other takers, India had one card left to play, Japan. The original partner, the pioneer of highspeed rail. And in a final push to revive the Mumbai Amedabad dream, Japan made a bold offer, a new train, the E10 series Shinkansen. Sounds impressive, right? Well, there’s a catch. This train doesn’t exist yet. The E10 is still in the design and testing phase. It’s Japan’s vision for nextg shinkinson expected to run domestically by 2030. But India, India wants it running by 2027. That’s like asking for a prototype iPhone 20, 5 years before Apple finishes building the iPhone 15. To make it work, India added its usual conditions. At least 50% of the train must be manufactured locally. It must be adapted to India’s hot, dusty climate. It must handle unstable voltage in India’s rail power grid. And all of this on a compressed schedule for Japan, this is unfamiliar territory. Their trains run like clockwork on precise, highly maintained tracks. India’s rail environment is not that even more problematic. This means India isn’t just building tracks anymore. It’s co-developing a train that no one has ever ridden under conditions it was never meant for. It’s not just a construction project now. It’s a massive tech experiment, a gamble, one that’s risky for both countries. And yet, India pushed ahead. Not because the plan was solid, but because there were no other options left. When you’re out of choices, every bet feels necessary. And so, India doubled down on a train that doesn’t exist. From a partner that’s running out of patience, on a timeline that defies engineering logic, the question now isn’t will it work? It’s what if it doesn’t because other countries have already built theirs and they didn’t wait around. While India was stuck in paperwork and promises, something remarkable was happening just 3,000 miles away. Indonesia, a country with similar challenges in infrastructure, had completed its first highspeed rail. It’s called the Jakarta Bandung Line, built by China, completed in just 5 years. No endless land delays, no experimental technology, no fantasy deadlines, just trains on tracks carrying passengers today. So what made it possible? China’s turnkey model. They didn’t just bring hardware. They brought the entire industrial chain design, civil work, rolling stock, signal systems, local worker training, everything. India too had this option. Back in 2015, before Japan sealed the deal, India was seriously considering China. They had signed a memorandum, done feasibility studies. There was even talk of joint ventures. But then came the pivot. Driven by geopolitical rivalry, fear of overdependence and national pride. India chose Japan. Now nearly a decade later, the cost has grown, not just in money, but in momentum. Indonesia’s highspeed rail has already cut travel time in half. Their wrership is surging. Their regional reputation growing fast. Meanwhile, India’s project still under construction. And it’s not just the tracks. India is still grappling with ETCS level 2 integration, a signaling system that Europe uses, but is complex and fragile in Indian conditions. China, they’ve already deployed their standard systems across six Southeast Asian countries, reliable, fast, exportable. India could have had that. Instead, it’s stuck trying to blend multiple systems from different countries. a patchwork that’s expensive to maintain and hard to scale. This isn’t just a missed train. It’s a missed opportunity to lead. And the longer it takes, the farther behind India risks falling. The question now isn’t can India build it. It’s did India wait too long? This isn’t just about one train line between Mumbai and Amedabad. It’s about something much bigger. A global race where steel, speed, and strategy collide. Because today, highspeed rail isn’t just transportation. It’s technology diplomacy. Let’s break it down. China has developed the CR450, a next generation bullet train that recently hit 450 km per hour in testing. That’s fast enough to go from Delhi to Mumbai in under four hours, city center to city center. It’s not a prototype. It’s real. Running on tracks being exported from Laos to Indonesia to Egypt. China now controls the entire supply chain. steel, electronics, signaling, construction crews, financing, and even the loan terms. They can build a rail system abroad faster than most countries can fix potholes. Now, compare that with Japan’s E10 series, the very train India has agreed to use. There’s just one issue. It’s still a PowerPoint train. Not a single one is run in Japan yet. In fact, it’s not even expected to launch domestically until 2030. And India wants to roll it out by 2027. That’s like asking someone to fly a plane before the wings are built. So, here’s where things stand. India, one of the world’s fastest growing economies, is caught between two tech titans. Japan, reliable, but slow, cautious, expensive. China, fast, aggressive, cheaper, but politically complicated. And India, still burdened by outdated procurement laws, state level bottlenecks, a lack of long-term industrial policy, and deeprooted mistrust of foreign control. It’s like trying to win a Formula 1 race while arguing over who gets to paint the car. This isn’t about choosing Japan or China. It’s about choosing a strategy. Because while India debates and delays, the rest of the world is moving on rails that hum at over 300 kmh. Highspeed rail has become a symbol of national capability. Like space programs or semiconductor fabs, it tells the world we’re not just big, we’re advanced. So far, India’s message has been, “We’re trying.” But trying isn’t enough in a tech arms race. The Mumbai Ahmedabad highspeed rail was never just about getting from point A to point B faster. It was a symbol of progress, of ambition, of India’s place in the future. But a symbol only works if it becomes reality. Right now, the project is stuck in the station, crippled by bureaucratic gridlock, unpredictable policy shifts, unrealistic localization demands, and a lack of long-term vision. Even with Japan’s support, the clock is ticking. The technology India is betting on isn’t ready. The timelines are slipping and global confidence is shaky. Other nations like Indonesia are already riding their bullet trains. India still debating its design. And while New Delhi insists on leading every part of the process, it’s also clear you can’t micromanage your way into modernity. You need alignment. You need speed. And above all, you need trust. The dream is still alive. The plan is still on the table. And India has the talent, the demand and the need. But the question is no longer about can India do it. The question is will it. Will India rise above politics and red tape? Will it build systems that reward coordination instead of confusion? Will it act like the global power it wants to be or keep hesitating while others move ahead? Because in the race toward the future, you don’t just need vision, you need velocity. And right now, the rest of the world is pulling ahead. If you found this breakdown insightful, subscribe to the channel, turn on notifications, and stay tuned because we’ll keep following the future of highspeed rail and whether India will still make it on board.

India’s Bullet Train: The $100 Billion Gamble That Stalled by psych’s Workspace

OUTLINE:

00:00:00 The Bold Beginning
00:00:17 A Decade of Delays and Disappointment
00:01:07 How Did It All Start?
00:01:59 Japan’s Grand Offer
00:02:43 What Went Wrong? Land, Delays, and Disputes
00:04:25 Desperation and the China Factor
00:05:08 Why Did China Say No?
00:06:53 The E10 Series Gamble
00:08:41 Indonesia’s Success, India’s Struggles
00:10:37 Technology, Diplomacy, and Strategy
00:12:43 The Symbolism and the Reality
00:13:36 Will India Catch Up — or Miss the Train?
00:14:06 Stay Tuned for the Future